By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
BigPaulSportsBigPaulSports
Notification Show More
Latest News
No. 25 Illinois Fighting Illini vs. No. 3 UCLA Bruins Highlights | FOX College Hoops
No. 25 Illinois Fighting Illini vs. No. 3 UCLA Bruins Highlights | FOX College Hoops
Game Analysis
Connor McDavid scores in OT to give Canada 3-2 win over USA in 4 Nations Face-Off final
Connor McDavid scores in OT to give Canada 3-2 win over USA in 4 Nations Face-Off final
Game Analysis
Maryland's Sarah Te-Biasu sinks 3-pointer to extend lead against Northwestern
Maryland’s Sarah Te-Biasu sinks 3-pointer to extend lead against Northwestern
Game Analysis
Maryland's Saylor Poffenbarger makes and-1 layup to extend lead against Northwestern
Maryland’s Saylor Poffenbarger makes and-1 layup to extend lead against Northwestern
Game Analysis
Eagles, Titans headline NFL teams that surrendered fewest total yards in 2024
Eagles, Titans headline NFL teams that surrendered fewest total yards in 2024
Game Analysis NFL
Aa
  • Big Paul Sports
  • Services
  • Game Analysis
  • Free Picks
  • Premium Content
  • Registration
  • Member Login
Reading: 2023 NFL draft class rankings: Which teams added the most consensus value?
Share
Aa
BigPaulSportsBigPaulSports
  • Big Paul Sports
  • Services
  • Game Analysis
  • Free Picks
  • Premium Content
  • Registration
  • Member Login
Search
  • Big Paul Sports
  • Services
  • Game Analysis
  • Free Picks
  • Premium Content
  • Registration
  • Member Login
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
BigPaulSports > Blog > Game Analysis > 2023 NFL draft class rankings: Which teams added the most consensus value?
Game AnalysisNFL

2023 NFL draft class rankings: Which teams added the most consensus value?

BigP
Last updated: 2023/05/02 at 1:05 PM
BigP Published May 2, 2023
Share
2023 NFL draft class rankings: Which teams added the most consensus value?
SHARE

Warren Sharp

Warren Sharp

FOX Sports NFL Writer

Grading the draft seems to be quite a hot button topic. Post a list of draft grades online and half the people who see it will complain that “you can’t grade the draft this close to the draft.” They want you to wait years to do so.

I think that’s a ridiculous assertion. Because the same people who want you to wait to grade a draft are those who read prospect evaluations posted online for months leading into the draft. The same ones who analyze every measurement and combine test. They project the transition of players to the NFL, endlessly discusses best team and scheme fits — and ultimately, while watching the draft, get mad at teams for drafting player X versus Y.

And yet they dislike grading a draft class?

Draft grades are rarely reliable, but they correlate very well with prospect evaluations.

If someone hates grades because they feel they “aren’t reliable”, they should realize that the prior several months when they ingested prospect evaluations through draft coverage (without complaining at all) were a colossal waste of time. Because if grades aren’t reliable, neither are prospect evaluations.

I enjoy reading prospect evaluations and post-draft assessments. I think general accuracy across the board is likely to be low, but it’s better than the alternative of doing zero analysis and having no clue what to expect from a draft class and their impact on the upcoming season.

An exercise I enjoy doing and believe has some merit is evaluating draft classes based upon a “wisdom of crowds” approach. This approach uses mock drafts and consensus big boards to compare expected draft position with where players were picked.

ADVERTISEMENT

The methodology I like to use incorporates consensus mock drafts from Ben Robinson and consensus big boards assembled by Arif Hasan.

We assign draft capital to each pick and compare the total draft capital used to draft that player relative to what was expected. Based on this methodology, we can determine which teams reached most to draft a player and which teams were able to get great value on players as they were drafted late.

These aren’t draft grades. There is no personal bias involved. But to answer a few questions about the methodology:

Looking at big boards does tend to predict the draft quite well.

And while we don’t know how these prospects ultimately will transition to the NFL nor how strong their careers will be, that is not the point of this exercise — nor does anyone possess that information at this time. The goal is to examine the teams who overdrafted or underdrafted.

These aren’t grades; they are ranking of NFL teams’ usage of draft capital, from No. 1 (best) to 32 (worst):

1. Steelers
2. Eagles
3. Browns
4. Broncos
5. Dolphins
6. Giants
7. Ravens
8. Titans
9. Bills
10. Colts
11. Bengals
12. Raiders
13. Bears
14. Vikings
15. Texans
16. Rams
17. Seahawks
18. Saints
19. Falcons
20. Buccaneers
21. Packers
22. Cardinals
23. Jaguars
24. Jets
25. Panthers
26. Chargers
27. Cowboys
28. Patriots
29. Commanders
30. 49ers
31. Chiefs
32. Lions

It should be noted I look only at the top 250 draft picks in the draft and I look only at the top 325 big-board prospects.

Let’s examine a few teams one-by-one:

The Steelers cleaned up in draft value. Only one pick was a slight reach (drafted earlier than expected) but Pittsburgh drafted the bulk of their picks much later than they were expected to go.

The Eagles delivered a dominant performance, clocking in with the second-best ranking based on usage of draft capital.

Clocking in third on the list is another AFC North squad, the Browns. Cleveland had more top-250 picks than either the Steelers or Eagles, and none in the first two rounds. But it was impressive to see how they navigated through the players bypassed by other teams to find excellent value up-and-down the board.

One example of a team that operated on the different end of the spectrum: the Detroit Lions. While the Lions’ first two picks in the first round were head scratchers based on how highly they drafted each player, they also drafted players like Brodric Martin, Colby Sorsdal and Sam LaPorta much higher than predicted in rounds 2 through 5. This exercise does not determine that a player, such as Martin, is a bust or won’t play well in the NFL. It does showcase that Martin would have likely been available after the third round and the Lions did not have to draft him almost three rounds earlier than they did (expected to be pick 260, was drafted at pick 164, nearly 100 picks earlier).

The Patriots and Cowboys were two teams who drafted many players far earlier than expected.

Time will tell whether teams who drafted players too early actually made the right calls by landing players who were far better than the consensus opinion of them. But until that day, we can look at data and determine which of these teams did the best job optimizing draft pick usage.

Here’s a final look at 2023 draft capital used by all 32 teams on both offense and defense:

Warren Sharp is an NFL analyst for FOX Sports. He is the founder of Sharp Football Analysis and has worked as a consultant for league franchises while also previously contributing to ESPN and The Ringer, among other outlets. He studied engineering and worked professionally in the engineering field before using his statistical acumen to create predictive football models. You can follow Warren on Twitter at @SharpFootball.


NFL trending


National Football League

Get more from National Football League Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more


in this topic

Sponsored Content

Juega en grande con cryptomonedas

You Might Also Like

No. 25 Illinois Fighting Illini vs. No. 3 UCLA Bruins Highlights | FOX College Hoops

Connor McDavid scores in OT to give Canada 3-2 win over USA in 4 Nations Face-Off final

Maryland’s Sarah Te-Biasu sinks 3-pointer to extend lead against Northwestern

Maryland’s Saylor Poffenbarger makes and-1 layup to extend lead against Northwestern

TAGGED: nfl
BigP May 2, 2023
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Youtube Subscribe
Telegram Follow
newsletter featurednewsletter featured

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

    Popular News
    Can the Jaguars quash their losing streak against the Texans? Recent history says yes
    NFLSports News

    Can the Jaguars quash their losing streak against the Texans? Recent history says yes

    BigP BigP December 31, 2022
    Will Colts buck tradition and franchise-tag WR Michael Pittman?
    Big Ben says Steelers tradition might be done
    Georgia CB Ringo, OT Jones entering NFL draft
    The biggest strengths for college football’s top 25 teams
    - Advertisement -
    Ad imageAd image

    Categories

    • Sports

    About US

    We offer information and tips on US Sports and evernts all over the world.
    Top Categories
    • Game Analysis
    • Free Picks
    • Services
    • Premium Content

    Subscribe US

    Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

      © Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.

      Removed from reading list

      Undo
      Welcome Back!

      Sign in to your account

      Lost your password?